 Social Network  analysis has now moved from being a suggestive metaphor  to an analytic approach to a paradigm, with its own theoretical  statements, methods, social network software and researchers. Analysts reason from whole to part; from structure to  relation to individual; from behavior to attitude. They typically either  study whole networks (also known as complete networks),  all of the ties containing specified relations in a defined population,  or personal networks (also known as egocentric networks),  the ties that specified people have, such as their "personal  communities".The distinction between whole/complete networks and personal/egocentric  networks has depended largely on how analysts were able to gather data.  That is, for groups such as companies, schools, or membership  societies, the analyst was expected to have complete information about  who was in the network, all participants being both potential egos and  alters. Personal/egocentric studies were typically conducted when  identities of egos were known, but not their alters.  These studies rely on the egos to provide information about the  identities of alters and there is no expectation that the various egos  or sets of alters will be tied to each other. A snowball network  refers to the idea that the alters identified in an egocentric survey  then become egos themselves and are able in turn to nominate additional  alters. While there are severe logistic limits to conducting snowball  network studies, a method for examining hybrid networks has  recently been developed in which egos in complete networks can nominate  alters otherwise not listed who are then available for all subsequent  egos to see. The hybrid network may be valuable for examining whole/complete  networks that are expected to include important players beyond those who  are formally identified. For example, employees of a company often work  with non-company consultants who may be part of a network that cannot  fully be defined prior to data collection. There is no assumption that groups are the building blocks of society:  the approach is open to studying less-bounded social systems, from  non local.
Social Network  analysis has now moved from being a suggestive metaphor  to an analytic approach to a paradigm, with its own theoretical  statements, methods, social network software and researchers. Analysts reason from whole to part; from structure to  relation to individual; from behavior to attitude. They typically either  study whole networks (also known as complete networks),  all of the ties containing specified relations in a defined population,  or personal networks (also known as egocentric networks),  the ties that specified people have, such as their "personal  communities".The distinction between whole/complete networks and personal/egocentric  networks has depended largely on how analysts were able to gather data.  That is, for groups such as companies, schools, or membership  societies, the analyst was expected to have complete information about  who was in the network, all participants being both potential egos and  alters. Personal/egocentric studies were typically conducted when  identities of egos were known, but not their alters.  These studies rely on the egos to provide information about the  identities of alters and there is no expectation that the various egos  or sets of alters will be tied to each other. A snowball network  refers to the idea that the alters identified in an egocentric survey  then become egos themselves and are able in turn to nominate additional  alters. While there are severe logistic limits to conducting snowball  network studies, a method for examining hybrid networks has  recently been developed in which egos in complete networks can nominate  alters otherwise not listed who are then available for all subsequent  egos to see. The hybrid network may be valuable for examining whole/complete  networks that are expected to include important players beyond those who  are formally identified. For example, employees of a company often work  with non-company consultants who may be part of a network that cannot  fully be defined prior to data collection. There is no assumption that groups are the building blocks of society:  the approach is open to studying less-bounded social systems, from  non local.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Social network analysis
 Social Network  analysis has now moved from being a suggestive metaphor  to an analytic approach to a paradigm, with its own theoretical  statements, methods, social network software and researchers. Analysts reason from whole to part; from structure to  relation to individual; from behavior to attitude. They typically either  study whole networks (also known as complete networks),  all of the ties containing specified relations in a defined population,  or personal networks (also known as egocentric networks),  the ties that specified people have, such as their "personal  communities".The distinction between whole/complete networks and personal/egocentric  networks has depended largely on how analysts were able to gather data.  That is, for groups such as companies, schools, or membership  societies, the analyst was expected to have complete information about  who was in the network, all participants being both potential egos and  alters. Personal/egocentric studies were typically conducted when  identities of egos were known, but not their alters.  These studies rely on the egos to provide information about the  identities of alters and there is no expectation that the various egos  or sets of alters will be tied to each other. A snowball network  refers to the idea that the alters identified in an egocentric survey  then become egos themselves and are able in turn to nominate additional  alters. While there are severe logistic limits to conducting snowball  network studies, a method for examining hybrid networks has  recently been developed in which egos in complete networks can nominate  alters otherwise not listed who are then available for all subsequent  egos to see. The hybrid network may be valuable for examining whole/complete  networks that are expected to include important players beyond those who  are formally identified. For example, employees of a company often work  with non-company consultants who may be part of a network that cannot  fully be defined prior to data collection. There is no assumption that groups are the building blocks of society:  the approach is open to studying less-bounded social systems, from  non local.
Social Network  analysis has now moved from being a suggestive metaphor  to an analytic approach to a paradigm, with its own theoretical  statements, methods, social network software and researchers. Analysts reason from whole to part; from structure to  relation to individual; from behavior to attitude. They typically either  study whole networks (also known as complete networks),  all of the ties containing specified relations in a defined population,  or personal networks (also known as egocentric networks),  the ties that specified people have, such as their "personal  communities".The distinction between whole/complete networks and personal/egocentric  networks has depended largely on how analysts were able to gather data.  That is, for groups such as companies, schools, or membership  societies, the analyst was expected to have complete information about  who was in the network, all participants being both potential egos and  alters. Personal/egocentric studies were typically conducted when  identities of egos were known, but not their alters.  These studies rely on the egos to provide information about the  identities of alters and there is no expectation that the various egos  or sets of alters will be tied to each other. A snowball network  refers to the idea that the alters identified in an egocentric survey  then become egos themselves and are able in turn to nominate additional  alters. While there are severe logistic limits to conducting snowball  network studies, a method for examining hybrid networks has  recently been developed in which egos in complete networks can nominate  alters otherwise not listed who are then available for all subsequent  egos to see. The hybrid network may be valuable for examining whole/complete  networks that are expected to include important players beyond those who  are formally identified. For example, employees of a company often work  with non-company consultants who may be part of a network that cannot  fully be defined prior to data collection. There is no assumption that groups are the building blocks of society:  the approach is open to studying less-bounded social systems, from  non local.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment